3 ms·
Yeah, Caesar was just Caesar, the emperors from the dynasty he founded continued to use his name, and then the emperors from following dynasties "adopted" his n
by rob74 2y ago
Yeah, Caesar was just Caesar, the emperors from the dynasty he founded continued to use his name, and then the emperors from following dynasties "adopted" his name as a title (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesar_(title) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesar_(title))
- 8338550bff96 2y agoWhich is irrelevant when you explicitly name Julius Caesar. Fun fact to whip out at parties but not applicable here
- adrian_b 2y agoWhile the Roman emperors attached "Caesar" to their names and eventually they were frequently referred as the current "Caesar", the official title of their function was "imperator", hence "emperor". Julius Caesar has refused the title "imperator", for reasons of public image, even if de facto he had the same power as an "imperator", i.e. the power to give commands that must be obeyed by anyone else. All his successors possessed the title of "imperator", so they are correctly referred as Roman "emperors".