3 ms·
Fair. But the docker image provider would be in violation, never having received a license to redistribute macOS images. Without these, the seamless usability a
by nine_k 2y ago
Fair. But the docker image provider would be in violation, never having received a license to redistribute macOS images. Without these, the seamless usability aspect is gone, though the repo remains pretty useful because it automates all other steps.
- windexh8er 2y agoIt's trivial to build these containers by grabbing the install images from Apple directly. Beyond that this is all covered in the documentation. I guess I'm curious why you're so focused on this violating anything? Apple clearly doesn't care as folks like myself have used it for years. Apple's target market is hardware buyers, not people who do things like this. If this actually impacted sales, sure - but Apple doesn't sell OSX anymore. As an aside the sickcodes work is great for people wanting to leverage Apple's "Find My" network with non-Apple devices by leveraging OpenHaystack [0]. [0] https://github.com/seemoo-lab/openhaystack https://github.com/seemoo-lab/openhaystack
- rty32 2y agoI assume EULA is mainly intended for preventing companies from running Hackintosh at a massive scale than aimed at individuals -- although build your business/infrastructure based on Hackintosh is a very questionable business and technical decision by itself.