6 ms·
Alas, I'm running a handful of websites, and nearly nothing works, outside of stopping the most egregious of automated bots. Every new protection technique see
by drone 14y ago
Alas, I'm running a handful of websites, and nearly nothing works, outside of stopping the most egregious of automated bots. Every new protection technique seems to be broken fairly fast. The best results so far have been combining basic WAF techniques (like placing poisoned form fields re-named as regular form fields and randomizing the names of standard form fields, one-time hash values in required fields, etc.) with some form of captcha.
However, every day five or six make it through. Observing their patterns and timing, and the fact that they make zero mistakes while interacting very slowly with the site, I can only presume that humans are directly involved as well, either as mechanical turks or simply manually posting the spam.
notably, they follow normal, guided flows through the site - not like robots at all, but hit pages that would obviously be interesting to a human (say, have a certain type of image content linking them versus another), while avoiding the least popular pages - never hit urls that are hidden via CSS, etc.
- seanp2k2 14y agoYup; human spammers are awful. Labor is so cheap now that it's financially viable to pay people to spam sites in some cases. The Internet is a sad place indeed.