3 ms·
For GC-based inner languages it's mandatory to mention that inter-language cycles are nasty. Life is much easier in a world of explicit ownership! I curate a l
by o11c 2y ago
For GC-based inner languages it's mandatory to mention that inter-language cycles are nasty. Life is much easier in a world of explicit ownership!
I curate a list of what kinds of ownership people actually want: https://gist.github.com/o11c/dee52f11428b3d70914c4ed5652d43f7 https://gist.github.com/o11c/dee52f11428b3d70914c4ed5652d43f...
It's been 6 years since I first posted it publicly, and neither I nor anyone giving suggestions has ever actually found a use for GC.
- zarzavat 2y agoIME the utility of GC is not for structs but for closures. It’s very easy to cause cycles when freely using closures in non-GC languages.