I definitely see some people complaining about liberal bias on social media getting voted down to heck. So yeah there are some negative voters on both sides. (p

I definitely see some people complaining about liberal bias on social media getting voted down to heck. So yeah there are some negative voters on both sides. (personally it feels like there's been a stupendous lack of evidence & these opinions deserve the downvotes, but it at least is an example of downvoting going both ways.) But man there is such a suppression of hacker spirit, of possibility, of everyday can do, of belief in the everyman and the barefoot developers. It's astoundingly how brutally malicious the conservative downvote squads are, and even more perniciously how much perfectly fine but inconvenient content gets flagged. It's hugely one sided; one side builds cases & tries to win hearts & minds, the other tears down, by any means available. So so rarely do I see conservative claims made on hopes or possibilities. Personally I think downvotes & especially flags should be more open data. The ability for a small pack of people to so consistently come and downvote out things they don't like is lame & tragic. But to so readily suppress is especially rank & disgusting. There are some incredibly persistently techbro conservative voices on here, it feels like, leveraging their accounts with enormous widespanning consistency & frequency, to close down ideas & thoughts. And they get to operate entirely from the shadows, and that ain't cool at all. At the very least there should be some way to see controversialness. It's hackerly to have some kind of data, to see pressure points! It stuns me how many things I have that are going up up up, only to have them get some down down voted. Seeing where there are these conflicts are, seeing that there strong valence both ways, I think would clarify a fundamental resonant truth of matters that right now is just cast away, lost to the losers of downvoting.