> Children have no sense of it I think such naturalistic arguments don't hold up. Children have no sense of many things - they don't see dangers in stepping on

> Children have no sense of it I think such naturalistic arguments don't hold up. Children have no sense of many things - they don't see dangers in stepping onto a street without looking, and they don't see dangers in giving up their privacy. If they don't value it, should we not protect their privacy? Children and some small societies often don't have a strong sense of property rights either - yet would you argue from that that a more complex society still doesn't require property rights?