> The previous poster is basically saying No. For fuck's sake no. The parent poster (parent to my original post) wrote that there is little to «expect» from a

> The previous poster is basically saying No. For fuck's sake no. The parent poster (parent to my original post) wrote that there is little to «expect» from a city, and recommended at least the in turn parent poster - who wrote about having been an exception as a city walker - to go to a park for walking. So I informed the parent poster that to walk in many European cities is, opposite to that idea, an experience of architecture, monuments and art. I.e.: walking many European cities is far from unusual and with reason. The idea of the poster above about time constraints and appointments is delirious and completely disconnected from what I wrote, literally, briefly, clearly, and exactly with the purpose of avoiding misunderstandings. I hope the above post is at least only the consequence of rushed reading.