4 ms·
No,the "counter argument" as you put it, is that if you only "know" things that come with a link, you have no value over an LLM
by AlbertCory 2y ago
No,the "counter argument" as you put it, is that if you only "know" things that come with a link, you have no value over an LLM
- throw0101b 2y ago> No,the "counter argument" as you put it, is that if you only "know" things that come with a link, you have no value over an LLM As opposed to knowing things without evidence and trying to convince people of a position without providing evidence? Is that how history is supposed to be done, without evidence? As least with a link you can gauge the quality of the reference and its sources.