I wouldn't be surprised if they had that. They also could've added a clause that Facebook now owns your house, and it'd probably be roughly as interesting to a

I wouldn't be surprised if they had that. They also could've added a clause that Facebook now owns your house, and it'd probably be roughly as interesting to a court. The fact is that many things buried in EULAs and whatnot are not really enforceable nor constitute consent. Some things have to be agreed to more explicitly than putting them on page 50 of your fine-print. It's especially problematic when companies start doing something you didn't directly sign up for or couldn't have expected to happen when you did. I don't think that many people who signed up for a social network in 2015 expected that their photos would later be scanned. It might surprise people even now.