3 ms·
> The committee's witnesses, three former Twitter executives, said in subpoenaed testimony that they mistakenly believed the Post article contained hacked mater
by dragontamer 2y ago
> The committee's witnesses, three former Twitter executives, said in subpoenaed testimony that they mistakenly believed the Post article contained hacked material and reversed their decision to limit its circulation on the social media platform within 24 hours.
You're complaining about a ban that was effectively overturned within 24 hours.
Do you expect White Dudes for Harris to be unbanned by tomorrow?
- koolba 2y ago> You're complaining about a ban that was effectively overturned within 24 hours. So you agree they were banned for publicizing a true story and that’s totally fine right? And the ban was not lifted in 24 hours. They refused to lift the ban until people deleted the posts that the (at the time) Twitter cabal considered verboten. > Do you expect White Dudes for Harris to be unbanned by tomorrow? If there’s a course of action to resolve the issue and it’s taken, yes I’d expect them to be unbanned. If the violation cannot be fixed, then probably not. Do you not?