> holding an important discussion. It's better to start an important discussion with a substantive comment than a quippy name-drop. There's definitely an inte

> holding an important discussion. It's better to start an important discussion with a substantive comment than a quippy name-drop. There's definitely an interesting discussion to be had about the lack of Supreme Court ethics guidelines and enforcement, bad faith judges, lobbyist influences on judges, etc. But building that discussion on a flamebait parent post isn't the strongest foundation.