4 ms·
Guess the point of this sub-threat is, that as long as you cannot show it in a well-done study, the potential is just that: potential. But not something tangibl
by pintxo 2y ago
Guess the point of this sub-threat is, that as long as you cannot show it in a well-done study, the potential is just that: potential. But not something tangible.
- rscho 2y agoThe big problem is: what does a well-conducted study mean to people? For me personally, I won't be convinced until machines get the same info as the doc, meaning the whole messy file raw plus what can be heard, seen or touched directly, and that's it!
- pintxo 2y agoIf a machine get's (statistically significant) better results than the docs with less information, that should be good as well, no? Although I would tend to say we should expect machines to be significantly better than the average doctor. Before we role them out to everyone we should require them to be at least as good as the top 10% of doctors, I guess.
- sigmoid10 2y agoI.e. literally the first sentence if the top post.