2 ms·
It's not only unverifiable, it's more likely than not to get it wrong. The number of assumptions is quite substantial, and they compound over time.
by tgv 2y ago
It's not only unverifiable, it's more likely than not to get it wrong. The number of assumptions is quite substantial, and they compound over time.
- Bluestein 2y agoInteresting questions, all. How far back, and further and further back, might we humans ever be able to reliably go in our research before the unreliability is too great? Will further computational advances, research methods and finds help? ... is there such thing as a "light (time) cone" beyond which we might not ever be able to look?