3 ms·
No, unfortunately I don’t think it can. I think because it’s dealing with strings it hasn’t abstracted away to meanings, in categories - it hasn’t or, cannot wi
by keepamovin 2y ago
No, unfortunately I don’t think it can. I think because it’s dealing with strings it hasn’t abstracted away to meanings, in categories - it hasn’t or, cannot with its current structure, learn symbolic computation.
so I think reasoning is impossible with this versions structure.
It just has an incredible memory bank of string completions, With a kind of rough and low level, symbolic substitution, to enable it to create innovative sentences, but that doesn’t lift to a full categorical, generalization ability to really create hierarchical, or networked graphs of meaning, nor to compute over the symbols of those graphs.