This specific paper looks plausible, but a lot of published AI papers are simply fake because it is one of the sectors where it is possible to make non-reproduc

This specific paper looks plausible, but a lot of published AI papers are simply fake because it is one of the sectors where it is possible to make non-reproducible claims. "We don't give source-code or dataset", but actually they didn't find or do anything of interest. It works and helps to get a salary raise or a better job, so they continue. A bit like when someone goes to a job interview, didn't do anything, and claims "My work is under NDA".