That’s a weird take. A singular "objective truth" never existed. That’s the basis of historiography. Publications can be "palatable" while not fitting one’s "

That’s a weird take. A singular "objective truth" never existed. That’s the basis of historiography. Publications can be "palatable" while not fitting one’s "worldview". The goal of reading should be to be challenged. You can find interesting things anchored in many theoretical frameworks and I encourage people to read editorials spanning different political leanings. To answer the original comment, I personally read and enjoy The New Yorker and grab the LRB and the Economist from time to time on top of what I read in my native language.