3 ms·
For those interested, found this review of a D3: http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3.htm http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3.htm Sounds pretty spectacular, thought I d
by bobbles 14y ago
For those interested, found this review of a D3: http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3.htm http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3.htm
Sounds pretty spectacular, thought I don't know that much about cameras
- tincholio 14y agoPlease, don't take Ken's stuff too seriously. If you want serious Nikon reviews, go to Thom Hogan's [0] or Moose Peterson's [1], or just dpreview for the technical nitty-gritty stuff. Ken Rockwell is fun to read, but he also 'reviews' stuff he hasn't seen, and has some moronic stances on some issues (like RAW vs. JPEG) [0] http://www.bythom.com/ http://www.bythom.com/ [1] http://www.moosepeterson.com/blog/ http://www.moosepeterson.com/blog/
- sgt 14y agoI agree, but overall Ken's opinion is definitely worth paying attention. He's often right, more often than not, in my opinion. Some will, ofcourse, dislike him. He's definitely not a "square" character. He's an entertaining oddball. It's kind of like the arguments against Top Gear as a car show. The truth is, Top Gear isn't only a car show.