4 ms·

Don't think the strategy to also-use Android as a latecomer and go against Samsung et al. without subsidies would have worked well.... The 'trojan horse guy' se

Don't think the strategy to also-use Android as a latecomer and go against Samsung et al. without subsidies would have worked well.... The 'trojan horse guy' seems to me more like a friendly enabler for the only/most successful looking strategy left.

pyre 14y ago
The fact that he's ex-Microsoft ends up looking fishy. I mean the guy leaves Microsoft to head Nokia and his first (?) major decision is to make Nokia a Microsoft shop. On the other hand, if you're constantly using hammers, then every problem can start to look like a nail (i.e. he felt that WP was the best solution because he spent a lot of time drinking the MS kool-aid, so to speak).
- berntb 14y ago
  It is fully possible Elop was hired after the decision to go to the dar... cough ... to go Microsoft.
  - felipeko 14y ago
    The previous CEO compared using android as 'peeing in your pants to stay warm', i wonder what using WP would have felt for him. And pretty sure Elop's memo is evidence enough he was the one changing Nokia (Symbian -> Meego) strategy.
    - berntb 14y ago
      That Elop was the one to announce the Microsoft strategy doesn't really prove he invented the idea since going there. Why else hire Elop specifically? The guys hiring him could have found a lot of CEOs with more telecom background.
SlipperySlope 14y ago
Nokia could have kept developing Symbian and used Android instead of Windows Phone. Nokia is about to compound their mistakes by trying to sell Windows 8 tablets.
Tichy 14y ago
Why would Android as a latecomer have worse prospects than "OS nobody wants as a latecomer"? They have been capable of creating good hardware, which is all Android users really want. Of course it is an ego thing, but I think in the beginning Symbian also did not belong to Nokia and they didn't mind using it for their phones (I might be wrong about the history here). Other companies like Samsung even manage to publish Android phones and phones with other OS.
- chappi42 14y ago
  (a bit late with replying, sorry..) The field is already well occupied by Samsung/HTC/Motorola. I suppose Android users care more about 'high-specs' than well done devices with more modest specs. Google would not have given specific help/subsidies to Nokia, but Microsoft does. As I own a Lumia, maybe I'm too subjective: but I like the device/OS and expect WP to become more popular with time.

pyre 14y ago

The fact that he's ex-Microsoft ends up looking fishy. I mean the guy leaves Microsoft to head Nokia and his first (?) major decision is to make Nokia a Microsoft shop. On the other hand, if you're constantly using hammers, then every problem can start to look like a nail (i.e. he felt that WP was the best solution because he spent a lot of time drinking the MS kool-aid, so to speak).

berntb 14y ago
It is fully possible Elop was hired after the decision to go to the dar... cough ... to go Microsoft.
- felipeko 14y ago
  The previous CEO compared using android as 'peeing in your pants to stay warm', i wonder what using WP would have felt for him. And pretty sure Elop's memo is evidence enough he was the one changing Nokia (Symbian -> Meego) strategy.
  - berntb 14y ago
    That Elop was the one to announce the Microsoft strategy doesn't really prove he invented the idea since going there. Why else hire Elop specifically? The guys hiring him could have found a lot of CEOs with more telecom background.

SlipperySlope 14y ago

Nokia could have kept developing Symbian and used Android instead of Windows Phone. Nokia is about to compound their mistakes by trying to sell Windows 8 tablets.

Tichy 14y ago

Why would Android as a latecomer have worse prospects than "OS nobody wants as a latecomer"? They have been capable of creating good hardware, which is all Android users really want. Of course it is an ego thing, but I think in the beginning Symbian also did not belong to Nokia and they didn't mind using it for their phones (I might be wrong about the history here). Other companies like Samsung even manage to publish Android phones and phones with other OS.

chappi42 14y ago
(a bit late with replying, sorry..) The field is already well occupied by Samsung/HTC/Motorola. I suppose Android users care more about 'high-specs' than well done devices with more modest specs. Google would not have given specific help/subsidies to Nokia, but Microsoft does. As I own a Lumia, maybe I'm too subjective: but I like the device/OS and expect WP to become more popular with time.