5 ms·
Reminds me of the questions they'd use in Harry Potter to identify themselves "What creature sat in the corner the first time that Harry Potter visited my offi
by chippiewill 2y ago
Reminds me of the questions they'd use in Harry Potter to identify themselves
"What creature sat in the corner the first time that Harry Potter visited my office at Hogwarts?"
- Refusing23 2y agoif thats the only question, it wont work for long
- johnnyanmac 2y agoI assume the actual questions will relate to conversations had in private in reality. Anywhere from "where did we go on [date]" to "I asked you X question back then, what was your reponse?"
- sigmoid10 2y agoFor a universe where everyone can turn into everyone, it seems this is way underutilized. Like, every single secret gathering or non-public meeting would need to start with everyone verifying their identity. Especially when parties are persecuted.
- csunbird 2y agoTo be fair, when you are meeting under a place that is protected by magic (Fidelius Charm?) to make sure that only people who know about the secret place can attend the meeting (and this information can only be shared by a single person, the secret keeper), it automatically validates that the people joining the meetings are authentic.
- wizzwizz4 2y agoExcept that time it didn't, which every character in those secret meetings should be aware of. (There's no point trying to defend the plot holes in Harry Potter: it's an entertaining story and important to many people, but well-written it is not.)
- Izkata 2y agoThis was explained: The secret-keeper died, so everyone who knew the secret became the new secret-keepers. They brought the outsider with them accidentally, which was enough for the magic to be satisfied that the secret-keeper showed them the secret.
- wizzwizz4 2y agoThe other time it didn't (revealed in the third book) should be enough for them to at least have their guards up. Though, given the events of the fourth book, every participant in the war must be incompetent at warcraft – which we do see in subsequent books. You could argue it's consistent with the characters being incredibly complex (traumatised veterans, ego-fuelled tunnel-vision, not actually caring about victory, etc)… but realistically they were written by a millionaire[1] with no experience of war, and are fairly one-dimensional characters. [1]: Sunday Mirror, Jul 9, 2000.
- Rinzler89 2y ago>For a universe where everyone can turn into everyone, it seems this is way underutilized. That's what you think the biggest issues is with the writing in Harry Potter, and not the underutilization of a time travelling deice they only hand out to a student so she can ... take extra classes? Don't get me wrong, I loved the books as a child, but as a grown-up now, they haven't aged well at all when you start to realized all the massive plot holes and sloppy writing.
- willcipriano 2y agoThey could wave a wand and feed the world, instead they come up with a pseudo racial slur for the people without magic that they laugh about behind closed doors.
- jeffwask 2y agoI work with a guy I know from college and asked him an obscure college related question to verify identity the other day.