4 ms·
Getting parity with SD 1.5 should require a similarly comprehensive data set, which seems a lot harder to source than a computer GPU. Especially now that we've
by Blackthorn 2y ago
Getting parity with SD 1.5 should require a similarly comprehensive data set, which seems a lot harder to source than a computer GPU. Especially now that we've got the A I-equivalent of pre/post nuclear steel.
- roenxi 2y agoGiven how little artistic data humans need, there are probably breakthroughs coming that will reduce the size of the data set needed. Or make it so that a lot of the data required is more generic (like how a human artist needs vast amounts of audio-visual data from walking around every day, but maybe as little as a few megabytes to go from nothing to copying a new style and subject - then we can have a curated open source "highlights of the first 20 years of life" data set that everyone uses for basic training).
- whywhywhywhy 2y ago> Getting parity with SD 1.5 should require a similarly comprehensive data set, which seems a lot harder to source Wasn't SD1.5 trained on LAION? So we know what it was and you could recreate it. Although I thought LAION was why SD1.5 is kinda ugly at base settings because LAION is just random images both good and bad content and quality not aesthetic and high quality images.
- philipkglass 2y agoThe LAION datasets don't contain actual images, but URLs pointing to images. Due to link rot and deliberate scraper-blocking it may be difficult to download LAION images to retrain a model to match SD 1.5.
- Blackthorn 2y agoLow-quality, non-aesthetic (but still natural) images are still pretty important for training a high quality, diverse model. Also unless someone saved the actual data somewhere and will make it available, LAION-5B is rotted away.