4 ms·
It's kind of the users' fault. Being "respectful" is less optimal and you get outcompeted/eliminated by those that aren't "respectful". The reason is because
by Ferret7446 2y ago
It's kind of the users' fault.
Being "respectful" is less optimal and you get outcompeted/eliminated by those that aren't "respectful". The reason is because users indirectly/subconsciously tolerate/support those that aren't "respectful".
If you want change, try convincing everyone to actively invest effort to support those that are "respectful". Good luck though, I don't think you'll get anywhere.
- m463 2y agoIsn't that sort of victim blaming? This post kind of says "people are getting wise" and the solution is "make sure everything and everyone on the internet is a fake influencer" sigh.
- Ferret7446 2y agoNo? Because the "victims" are voluntarily choosing what businesses they patronize. No one is forcing them to choose "bad business" instead of "good business" and thus causing "good business" to go out of business. Protip: the good businesses tend to be more expensive and harder to find, and customers aren't willing to spend the extra time and money for the "good business".
- armada651 2y agoWhich is why you need regulation, to make sure there's a level playing field where the "bad business" can't out-compete the "good business" using methods that harm consumers.
- bimguy 2y agoThis has got to be one of the most out-of-touch comments I've ever read on HN. Most users of the internet aren't tech saavy and should not be preyed upon because of it.
- s1artibartfast 2y agoThere's some truth to it. There are some situations where it is extremely difficult for even impossible to protect people from themselves.