3 ms·
Code, model, data and under Apache 2.0. Impressive. Curious how this was allowed to be more open source compared to Llama's interesting new take on "open sourc
by robbomacrae 2y ago
Code, model, data and under Apache 2.0. Impressive.
Curious how this was allowed to be more open source compared to Llama's interesting new take on "open source". Are other projects restricted in some form due to technical/legal issues and the desire is to be more like this project? Or was there an initiative to break the mold this time round?
- swyx 2y agodata is creative commons
- Nesco 2y agoLLMs are trained on the entire internet so loads of copyrighted data, which Meta can’t distribute, and is afraid to even reference
- _giorgio_ 2y ago[flagged]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- Zuiii 2y agoThis argument doesn't make sense to me unless you're talking about the training material. If that is not the case, then how does this argument relate to the license Meta attempts to force on downloaders of LLaMa weights?
- owenpalmer 2y agothey're literally talking about the training material.
- 8organicbits 2y agoYeah, but there's a CLA for some reason. I'm wary they will switch to a new license down the road.
- phkahler 2y agoSo get it today. You can't retroactively change a license on someone.
- 8organicbits 2y agoYeah, but it's a signal they aren't thinking of the project as a community project. They are centralizing rights towards themselves in an unequal way. Apache 2.0 without a CLA would be fine otherwise.