3 ms·
That would be if they specifically wanted a Chatbot. What I would like from Apple is a smart assistant that is actually smart. That implies it has access to an
by dwaite 2y ago
That would be if they specifically wanted a Chatbot.
What I would like from Apple is a smart assistant that is actually smart. That implies it has access to and can do reasoning about a ton of work-related as well as rather personal information which I don't want to share carte blanc with OpenAI or Google or Meta.
So I would like to be able to just ask if I had anything going on this coming weekend, and for it to bring up a relevant conversation from last week in WhatsApp. Meta probably doesn't want to share conversations carte blanc with Google and OpenAI either, nor can they with the E2E privacy posturing they've presented around WhatsApp.
- talldayo 2y agoWell, stay optimistic. We hoped for a Siri that "is actually smart" for 10 long years, and we got some pretty new animations and a new few new voices to pick. If Apple's plan is to rely on OpenAI for serious performance improvements then we might as well throw in the towel now and admit they have no idea what they're doing. > That implies it has access to and can do reasoning about a ton of work-related as well as rather personal information which I don't want to share carte blanc with OpenAI or Google or Meta. So let me get this straight. You want to use Apple's AI because it will use their OS entitlements to get information out of Google and Meta's apps that you wouldn't otherwise share with them? I... don't think you can stop those companies from getting your data in apps they operate. Ironically, if you could replace Apple's OpenAI integration with either Google or Meta's LLMs then you would have a fully transparent system that you can prove doesn't send any information to Big Tech. You and I aren't allowed to validate Apple's AI servers, we're just allowed to look at the whitepaper.