3 ms·

Consider also Tube Archivist. If you just want to download a few videos it's overkill, but I use it to archive and index technical channels I like. It can do ad

Consider also Tube Archivist. If you just want to download a few videos it's overkill, but I use it to archive and index technical channels I like. It can do advanced full text and metadata searches on the transcription/subtitles as well as comments (and title and description). Much better than what alphabet provides, annoyingly. https://www.tubearchivist.com/ https://www.tubearchivist.com/

stndef 2y ago
I second this. It's great!
toomuchtodo 2y ago
How does it compare to PeerTube? Would be cool if these instances could be federated, ActivityPub or something similar.
grep_name 2y ago
I've been meaning to migrate to tube archivist forever, but I have several TB of youtube videos I don't want to re-download which I gathered using tubesync. Luckily I have the format string used to save the files by name and since tubesync uses django and a postgres backend I might be able to tie them to the youtube ID. But migration still seems like it might be a bit of a nightmare
password4321 2y ago
Another option on the home page earlier today: Yark: YouTube Archiver with Offline UI https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41100820 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41100820
nirav72 2y ago
I was looking at TubeArchivist. But didn’t like that it required 3 separate containers. Then I found Pinchflat on the selfhosted sub. It works as a single container and was easy deployment. Has been working well. https://github.com/kieraneglin/pinchflat https://github.com/kieraneglin/pinchflat
- prmoustache 2y ago
  That is a super clever name for a youtube downloading tool!
seoulmetro 2y ago
Google will never make it comfortable to use their products in any structured, advanced way as it is super beneficial to the user and gives away way too much control. Google hates that.
zenoprax 2y ago
Hard pass. The file naming is predicated on having the database. For ephemeral storage this is understandable but any software that describes itself as "archival" should assume that it will not outlive the data it is preserving. I was excited to have a PeerTube clone with download capabilities until I looked at the result. `yt-dlp` and clever configs and scripts will do the archival job properly.
- halJordan 2y ago
  I like how you're willing to archive videos but refuse to archive the playback mechanism for it. Is backing up a docker image really a deal breaker for you?

stndef 2y ago

I second this. It's great!

toomuchtodo 2y ago

How does it compare to PeerTube? Would be cool if these instances could be federated, ActivityPub or something similar.

grep_name 2y ago

I've been meaning to migrate to tube archivist forever, but I have several TB of youtube videos I don't want to re-download which I gathered using tubesync. Luckily I have the format string used to save the files by name and since tubesync uses django and a postgres backend I might be able to tie them to the youtube ID. But migration still seems like it might be a bit of a nightmare

password4321 2y ago

Another option on the home page earlier today: Yark: YouTube Archiver with Offline UI https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41100820 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41100820

nirav72 2y ago

I was looking at TubeArchivist. But didn’t like that it required 3 separate containers. Then I found Pinchflat on the selfhosted sub. It works as a single container and was easy deployment. Has been working well. https://github.com/kieraneglin/pinchflat https://github.com/kieraneglin/pinchflat

prmoustache 2y ago
That is a super clever name for a youtube downloading tool!

seoulmetro 2y ago

Google will never make it comfortable to use their products in any structured, advanced way as it is super beneficial to the user and gives away way too much control. Google hates that.

zenoprax 2y ago

Hard pass. The file naming is predicated on having the database. For ephemeral storage this is understandable but any software that describes itself as "archival" should assume that it will not outlive the data it is preserving. I was excited to have a PeerTube clone with download capabilities until I looked at the result. `yt-dlp` and clever configs and scripts will do the archival job properly.

halJordan 2y ago
I like how you're willing to archive videos but refuse to archive the playback mechanism for it. Is backing up a docker image really a deal breaker for you?