> incredible and amazing for technical users > Do they need to be 100% error free before the general public can accept them and use them We should think of th

> incredible and amazing for technical users > Do they need to be 100% error free before the general public can accept them and use them We should think of the consequences of using an error prone technology for anything even slightly important before we start using it. Technical users are good understanding the limitations, that is except if they have financial or other motive to understate the limitations. A judge is likely a non-technical person, which would tend to trust experts, who often are not as experts as they are assumed to be. We have seen in multiple occasions how the misuse of technology which is not enough understood has negatively impacted people and have lead to convictions of innocents, including facial recognition technology and DNA-identification techniques. Saying that we can just use such a technology without caring much how correct it is without caring about this is irresponsible at best, considering the history to warn us that we should not be reckless like that is just right out there. Now, if you wanna replace your interns with AI at your work it is your choice, but let's see where all this leads one eventually.