3 ms·

I was pleasantly surprised -- I was expecting something far more esoteric and less approachable than this ended up being. Honestly I'm fascinated by the simplic

I was pleasantly surprised -- I was expecting something far more esoteric and less approachable than this ended up being. Honestly I'm fascinated by the simplicity of this. But I'm left wondering whether there is much of a practical application for distinguishing the four methods? For example, are there circumstances where you might reasonably be expected to use the consensus method, but you'd be better off using the pragmatic method? Another thing it leaves on the table is the actual consensus used -- is it possible to judge the functionality or utility of a given consensus vs. another? There's a lot to think through here and I wanted more. But it's a great start -- a much better start than I expected.

snowpid 2y ago
" But I'm left wondering whether there is much of a practical application for distinguishing the four methods? For example, are there circumstances where you might reasonably be expected to use the consensus method, but you'd be better off using the pragmatic method? " One case would be, where you disagree with the experts because you can think there aren't good experts at all. There have been many disagree if psycho analysis is a good approach of therapy.