9 ms·
That's an awful lot of co-authors! It would be more convincing if the first example I looked at, travel from Bournemouth to Glasgow (Fig. 5), didn't contain an
by eesmith 2y ago
That's an awful lot of co-authors!
It would be more convincing if the first example I looked at, travel from Bournemouth to Glasgow (Fig. 5), didn't contain an error. It says the train trip between those two is "around 4 hours", when Google Maps says it's 7-8 hours.
So I looked at Fig. 3 regarding things for families with kids to do in Kalamata. Suggestion #3 is "Explore the Olive Museum". It does not appear to exist. The Museum of the Olive and Greek Olive Oil is in Sparta, over 1 hour away by car.
Yet the paper does not mention the failures in their own test cases.
They could do with another proofread. "They have relied on search engines, such as google, ..." has a lowercase "google" where elsewhere they use "Google", and "certain digital tools (e.g., Calculator; text editing, GPS systems)" should use "calculator".
- Bluestein 2y ago> They have relied on search engines, such as google, ..." has a lowercase "google" where elsewhere they use "Google", That kind of detail shows deficient proofreading IMH9 ...