4 ms·
That "car is slower than train" really only works when everybody happens to live near train station A and when the group of friends plans to take its vacation
by TacticalCoder 2y ago
That "car is slower than train" really only works when everybody happens to live near train station A and when the group of friends plans to take its vacation near train station B.
By plane it can be even worse : time to go to the airport + buffer of one or two hours to not miss the plane + landing and waiting for luggage and then time to go from the airport to your destination.
For our usual vacation, car takes 8 hours (950 kilometers) while plane takes 6h30... Still a win but then you're left with no car or having to rent a car: renting the car is another 30 minutes. So 7 hours vs 8 hours and you re stuck with a car inevitably (for me) shittier than yours.
Train isn't even close to competing time wise in our case. But I have fond memories back when, as a kid, we d put the car on the train and then take the same train.
I have nothing against rail and it s great it s developing in the EU. But on many cases it's simply not a time saver compared to car.
- barrkel 2y agoThe primary time-saver of a train is you can work on the train.
- epolanski 2y agoOr even just read and relax instead of being tense for 6 hours, especially as Italy has some terrible drivers.
- hulitu 2y ago> as Italy has some terrible drivers. Just like any country. IMHO drivers from Switzerland are more terrible than those from Italy.
- LtWorf 2y agoIf you can work with no internet…