3 ms·
From your linked article: > A Hacker News user claimed that Nice to see Wikipedia has devolved even further into a dumpster fire in that they are now citing r
by wannacboatmovie 2y ago
From your linked article:
> A Hacker News user claimed that
Nice to see Wikipedia has devolved even further into a dumpster fire in that they are now citing random HN posts as authoritative sources of facts.
- majewsky 2y agoWikipedia is not an individual actor or a hivemind, so there is no capital-T "They". It's a system of multiple people each acting on their own accord. For a developing news story like this, I find this type of sourcing acceptable, especially because it is cited as "some person on the internet claims", not as "it is true that". If you disagree with this choice of source, you can flag this part as needing better sources. The simplest way to do so is to just leave a comment on the talk page.