4 ms·

Guns are also a form of property, but nobody thinks that declaration says every human has a right to own guns. The right to own property doesn't mean you have t

Guns are also a form of property, but nobody thinks that declaration says every human has a right to own guns. The right to own property doesn't mean you have the right to own all forms of property, almost nobody thinks you should have the right to own all forms of property. > Edit: why the negative downvotes to an a proven refutation You didn't refute anything, red being a color doesn't mean a color is necessarily red. That is a classic logical mistake to make.

berdario 2y ago
> The right to own property doesn't mean you have the right to own all forms of property Maybe? If you want a specific form of property, and you have the means to acquire it, lots of people would probably think that you should be let owning what you want. Of course "means to acquire" encompasses a lot of situations in which ultimately a person has more power than others: you might have more money than your peers bidding for this property, or it might be an "adverse possession" kind of situation, or anyhow ultimately you get the state/law/authorities to agree with you, which means that you can benefit from the state's monopoly on violence...