3 ms·
>I’m basically confidently faking it like ChatGPT. No, this is different. You're reading a scholarly source and regurgitating it without knowing some of the t
by shiroiushi 2y ago
>I’m basically confidently faking it like ChatGPT.
No, this is different. You're reading a scholarly source and regurgitating it without knowing some of the tiny details or exceptions that would only be common knowledge to an actual practitioner in the field.
ChatGPT would be making up completely different things, such as claiming the artificial hearts use subspace fields to work.
- Filligree 2y agoI have literally never seen it do something like that.
- itishappy 2y agoChatGPT says pretty much exactly what the parent comment said, because they both used pretty much exactly the same workflow to generate responses. Both are pulling from scholarly sources (and shared experience such as their knowledge of language) and synthesizing an answer. Neither are experts in the field. Ironically, the main source of misinformation in this thread appears to be you.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]