good move to not require signup/signin to give it a go, i would have otherwise just bounced entirely. Def. the kind of tool where that is possible. > Many note

good move to not require signup/signin to give it a go, i would have otherwise just bounced entirely. Def. the kind of tool where that is possible. > Many note-taking apps today single-paged have high-think-threshold (windows notepad/apple notes have very low-think-threshold), you have to think before you write in them, so not a good option for quick ideas. It's good that you are identifying competitors / alternative solutions; but "thinking before writing in them" is not a pain i think most users would connect with, nor is your platform in any way changing this dynamic of interaction. So it feels like a reach. The UI looks good, but there are some UX frustrations. to me this overall does too much - there are too many things. It's good they are tucked away in menus but it is overthought to the point of being overwhelming. But...could possibly be addressed via different progressive disclosure. I can see how/why you might use it. but for me it is not the right "it". It's also not "for devs" in the way you maybe want it to be as a platform. That all but kills it for me. I don't think that as a premise has a market. Also, the split panel as a design decision feels constraining. Who are you to tell me how to use your software? And with them being the same objects it just feels redundant or like I'm expected to type with the left and right hands separately. But with a different start state and maybe using two different panels you could create more 'ah-ha". I would lean into making this like a jsfiddle where it's low friction to generate things and share it with others. That can be a great starting point, and help give direction to the product.