3 ms·

First thing that comes to mind is that Recall stuff from a month ago, they also release updates[0] that crash machines. [0] https://www.tomsguide.com/news/wind

• TeMPOraL 2y ago
  Recall actually is a brilliant idea, and I dreamed of something like it for a long time, and so did plenty people here. It's just not something you can trust a third-party business with, whether it's a fly-by-night startup or an international megacorporation known to be openly promiscuous with advertisers. This is basically "take a screenshot every 30 seconds and compile it into a timelapse", but on steroids, and the same appeal, and arguments wrt. who gets to run it on whose machines, all apply.
  • dahdum 2y ago
    If you keep your business and personal computing separate, Recall looks amazing.
  • clwg 2y ago
    The functionality does seem intriguing, that doesn't change it's security profile which was poorly thought out and implemented.
• feyman_r 2y ago
  Ignoring Windows Insider reports is bad. However, how many endpoints having issues (out of a billion+) is ‘acceptable’ after an update? We live in a news hype cycle so clearly even the one wrong failure will make it up somewhere. However, without metrics that show BSoDs from patches (which MS will likely never share), it’s hard to see if things have improved or regressed. If they regressed, someone up in their leadership chain is hopefully following the constructive discussion here.