3 ms·
And it seems to confirm, although not completely explicit, that there was _not_ a canary facility in place.
by ttymck 2y ago
And it seems to confirm, although not completely explicit, that there was _not_ a canary facility in place.
- Spooky23 2y agoCorrect. It sounds like they test changes to code in such a facilty, but “content” is only validated by a parser. Mcafee did something similar a decade ago. It’s a hard problem - the whole point of Crowdstrike is to quickly respond to threats. (And they are very good at it) So you want time to market for marginal changes to be very fast. Normally I’d give them the benefit of the doubt, but their arrogance and poor response triggers my spidey-sense.