3 ms·
Not every country works the same, coming from a place with low home ownership (40%, mostly in countryside). Some ideas of what can be different: - lower flexi
by tonfa 2y ago
Not every country works the same, coming from a place with low home ownership (40%, mostly in countryside).
Some ideas of what can be different:
- lower flexibility (non liquid and concentrated investment)
- many people will end up with majority of their savings in real estate instead of more productive part of the economy (companies, etc.)
- might discourage people from seeking opportunities elsewhere if there's a high cost of selling/buying houses
- in cities institutional owners (here a lot of buildings are owned by pension funds) can take a better care of multi family buildings (compared to a fragmented ownership where some owners might block even value preserving investment), it's also easier to mandate policies (e.g. better isolation, etc) for those institutional owners
- freitzkriesler2 2y ago[flagged]
- readthenotes1 2y agoI introduced myself to you in your comment currently "above":)
- tonfa 2y ago> I have yet to ever meet these types of people where renting ever makes sense. They clearly don't exist. As I mentioned, not every country is the same :) Most buy vs. let simulation will tell you not to buy in over priced swiss cities. I'm happy to have pension funds take care of my housing needs for their 1 or 2% return and invest my equity in stock market instead of tying 1 or 2M on housing.