>Regulation usually gets trotted out after the downside of doing [new innovation] is experienced. This always happens, because doing something new always involv

>Regulation usually gets trotted out after the downside of doing [new innovation] is experienced. This always happens, because doing something new always involves unknown risk. I would challenge "unknown"-- it very well seems like the risks have been known every time, they just don't give a shit >What's different now though, is the hysteria over AI is leading regulators to pass this incumbent-cementing regulation before we've even had a chance to experience ... Sounds good to me? It's sociopathic and opportunistic to want to risk major socioeconomic issues for the mere chance of a corporate "innovation"