3 ms·
I suspect you are forgetting the possibility they just didn't cover that particular proof.
by nitwit005 2y ago
I suspect you are forgetting the possibility they just didn't cover that particular proof.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- jrochkind1 2y agoI also would have thought that it would be covered in a CS curriculum, as I said. it'snot just some random proof, but an important foundational one. (I don't think I "forgot a possibilty", I just thought it usually would). You are saying you took classes that covered logic, number theory, group theory, algorithmic complexity, discrete math, and calculus, and you are certain none of them covered this? Too bad, that is unfortunate! I'm glad you found it on your own! it's really neat!
- YZF 2y agoYeah. It's pretty foundational. e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleph_number https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleph_number I guess it's possible to teach it without going through the proof.