4 ms·
My bad, confused the two companies. It seems that that Marvell supported the Switchdev via Dent NOS but for this new Teralynx switch they're utilizing SONiC in
by teleforce 2y ago
My bad, confused the two companies.
It seems that that Marvell supported the Switchdev via Dent NOS but for this new Teralynx switch they're utilizing SONiC instead [1]. Just curious if they are targeting SONiC then it must support Switchdev because it's what being used underneath.
[1] Marvell Announces Industry’s First Commercial Switch Platforms with Dent to Accelerate Smart Retail and Enterprise Edge Infrastructure:
https://www.marvell.com/company/newsroom/marvell-announces-industrys-first-commercial-switch-platforms-with-dent-to-accelerate-smart-retail-and-enterprise-edge-infrastructure.html https://www.marvell.com/company/newsroom/marvell-announces-i...
- eqvinox 2y agoSONiC has options for both switchdev as well as proprietary-binary-blob backends. It's certainly possible Marvell is shipping the former — but I looked and didn't find anything. It might just not quite be fully published yet (and propagated into search engines)… or it's a proprietary-binary-blob switch driver.