4 ms·
The same argument could be made for any software. I disagree, cars should be fully updated OTA. It's cheaper than a recall and easier for the consumer. New fea
by quonn 2y ago
The same argument could be made for any software.
I disagree, cars should be fully updated OTA. It's cheaper than a recall and easier for the consumer. New features increase the longevity of the car.
- jasomill 2y agoSo long as both manufacturers and executives are willing to assume unlimited liability for all direct, incidental, and consequential losses caused by both updates themselves and any security vulnerabilities in the update mechanism, and are held criminally liable in cases where negligence leads to injury or death, I have no problem with this.
- quonn 2y agoWhy would they be, anymore than for the original product? Also, do you have a single example where there was a security vulnerability in the update mechanism of a car that resulted in an attack? Do you have a single example of a loss caused by an update (that would not also occur during offline servicing)?