3 ms·
I concur, but, also am thinking that it might be some sort of "purist" drive, in the "eat your own dogfood" [to the utomost] kind of way, by not having a human
by Bluestein 2y ago
I concur, but, also am thinking that it might be some sort of "purist" drive, in the "eat your own dogfood" [to the utomost] kind of way, by not having a human "in the loop"? (ie. releasing inmediately post-AI action -without- human checking?. Even, an "ideological" stance?
(Granted, your point about the desirability of basics, still holds ...)
- exe34 2y agowell the original voice/tutor demo by "open" AI was heavily choreographed, wasn't it? it seems like it's just different people doing it, so they just have to learn from the same mistakes again.
- Bluestein 2y agoY'all upthread, raise - word for word - spot-on insightful points.-
- shmeeed 2y agoIf I had to take a guess, I'd say they probably just drank their own Kool-Aid and routinely fall prey to overconfidence. It might as well be dogfooding, but to me that seems a bit too, hm, say, intellectually honest for what is basically a PR move in a hype market.
- sdwr 2y ago(Without seeing the link) Lack of polish indicates core belief in the message/product. On one hand: Marketing copy should be word-perfect, with no grammar errors. On the other: Video of baby's first steps should be raw + unedited. The more you move towards a "real moment", the less sense it makes to polish it to a mirror sheen
- JohnFen 2y ago> Lack of polish indicates core belief in the message/product. It certainly can, but not always. In any case, this effect is why when I see a product that has a high degree of polish, I take it as a weak signal that the product is not great.