2 ms·
i wish nanoVMs were better. its a cool concept leveraging the actual VM extensions for security. but all the ones i've seen hardly get into user-mode, dont have
by sim7c00 2y ago
i wish nanoVMs were better. its a cool concept leveraging the actual VM extensions for security. but all the ones i've seen hardly get into user-mode, dont have stack protectors or other trivial security features enabled etc. (smap/smep) making it super insecure anyway.
maybe someday that market will boom a bit more, so we can run hypervisors with vms in there that host single application kind of things. like a BSD kernel that runs postgres as its init process or something. (i know thats oversimplified probarbly ::P).
there's a lot of room in the VM space for improvement ,but pretty much all of it is impossible if you need to load an entire OS multi-purpose-multi-user into the vm.....