3 ms·
EDIT: My barbaric/peasant state of intuition says that K is more like a differential equation (Maxwell's equations) but S is more akin to the "integral form" (
by vinnyvichy 2y ago
EDIT:
My barbaric/peasant state of intuition says that K is more like a differential equation (Maxwell's equations) but S is more akin to the "integral form" (Jefimenko's)
Note how the People feel like they understand M but for J they feel at least a bit of wariness..
And thanks for the JCS quote, it does feel relevant to the struggle to even design useful quantum computers
Going back to mulling the Lagrange multipliers now :)
Pace Darwin, the anglo geniuses seem generally trigger happy -- not good for HN idolatry (up to and including the manPG)
(Grassmann vs Hamilton, if you want to visit that general topic)
(JM Keynes vs..?)
- 082349872349872 2y ago> the struggle to even design useful quantum computers My knee-jerk question for the last few decades (which I probably st^Wliberated from MGM?) is "given that we succeed in decoupling the system enough to accomplish some quantum computation, how do we expect to be coupling it enough to feed the problem in and write the results out?"
- vinnyvichy 2y agoAs usual the childlike questions are the hardest ..