Headline is not accurate. Good for the ban still, but this was preliminary stuff and there are going to be conflicting rulings on this almost certainly. The rul

Headline is not accurate. Good for the ban still, but this was preliminary stuff and there are going to be conflicting rulings on this almost certainly. The rule is very broad, affecting senior execs etc. My instinct is a somewhat narrower scope ban might have had a better chance of surviving? 80% of bans are totally overbroad and silly (affecting folks not earning > $150K). > $150 - $200K some kind of provisions (ie, up to 3 or 6 months gardening leave max) would be in line with some international approaches. This time is still paid for by the employer, and is due even if employee quits.