4 ms·
Seems also like a perverse incentive to delay or avoid hiring as well. Every new employee makes everyone else poorer. Unless that one employee is so productive
by missedthecue 2y ago
Seems also like a perverse incentive to delay or avoid hiring as well. Every new employee makes everyone else poorer. Unless that one employee is so productive they single handedly make up for lost ownership with increased profit.
- Scarblac 2y agoWell, is that a perverse incentive? Maybe it just means the company is better off without another employee right now. But the employees also have other things in mind besides profit, like their work load.