3 ms·
The idea behind that is neat. And well, the conversion from the ladder diagram to PLC bytecode is intentionally so trivial that it can be done by hand if the la
by dfox 2y ago
The idea behind that is neat. And well, the conversion from the ladder diagram to PLC bytecode is intentionally so trivial that it can be done by hand if the ladder diagram is drawn in certain way (which is the way the first PLCs were programmed).
Then there is the reality: every single one of Simatic projects I have seen was done by “PLC programmers” and had this peculiar feature of using the abstractions the wrong way around. Straightforward logic written as Instruction Lists (ie. assembly that produces the bytecode) and things that were straightforward sequential programming built from ridiculously complex schematic diagrams.
- buescher 2y agoHeh. It figures. Sometimes when I see things like that I wonder if it's featherbedding and gatekeeping. If it looks too straightforward, people might not think what you do is very hard. See the schematic discussion elsewhere in this thread for another example