4 ms·
>> Simulink is a really nice way to do some control problems in. Agreed. But it needs to stop there. BTW I never understood why the tool needs to know what pro
by phkahler 2y ago
>> Simulink is a really nice way to do some control problems in.
Agreed. But it needs to stop there. BTW I never understood why the tool needs to know what processor the code is for. I asked them to provide a C99 target so they don't need to define their own data types in generated code. Does that exist yet? Or do they still define their own UINT_16 types depending on the target?
- rightbyte 2y agoDunno and I haven't worked with Simulink since 2019. There is this "type replacement" setting such that you can make Coder spit out "uint16_t" instead, but if I remember correctly, there was bugs such that you still needed to have the manual translation header. Like, some module of Simulink didn't follow the setting. God I don't miss working with Mathworks products. > Agreed. But it needs to stop there. Heh. Ye ... about that.