2 ms·
On NT you can get this sort of stuff through WMI, although I'll admit it's not entirely clear to me how that resolves internally
by zokier 2y ago
On NT you can get this sort of stuff through WMI, although I'll admit it's not entirely clear to me how that resolves internally
- yjftsjthsd-h 2y agoI guess my point/question was more - is whatever system/library call you'd use atomic? There's technically no reason the system couldn't have a syscall that returns a full data structure of process info for as many processes as are in scope and guarantee that it's a perfect atomic snapshot of exactly how the process table looked when that call returned, but I'd want to be very confident and have explicit documentation promising as much before I depended on it.