3 ms·
You say that humans are weak in terms of physical attributes[1] and then ignore the substance of the argument when someone replies and points out that humans ar
by keybored 2y ago
You say that humans are weak in terms of physical attributes[1] and then ignore the substance of the argument when someone replies and points out that humans are the best animal at long-distance running. Which is not a fitness attribute that anyone serious disregards… any human that is, to be fair.
[1] But you have the “literal strenght” narrow fallback though.
- jerf 2y ago"You said a thing, and I understood what the thing meant, but then I reinterpreted the thing to mean something else that made you wrong. Ha! I win!" No, you don't.
- keybored 2y agoIt’s such a glaring thing to miss. We have bad explosive strength (… contra slow-twitch endurance power, contra this whole thing that people actively exercise to get better at.) It’s impossible to not see the incongruity after the fact.