3 ms·
Anyone in charge of hiring should be fired if they go more than X days/weeks without actually hiring someone. I've seen people complain that their biggest impe
by sandworm101 2y ago
Anyone in charge of hiring should be fired if they go more than X days/weeks without actually hiring someone. I've seen people complain that their biggest impediment to growth is getting hires through their own HR departments.
- darby_nine 2y ago> Anyone in charge of hiring should be fired if they go more than X days/weeks without actually hiring someone. This kind of attitude is fine at large companies, but it's a good way to absolutely sink your small business.
- mbreese 2y agoSmall companies don’t have people whose only job is to hire other people. So yes, this is a large company problem. When you’re small, generally everyone is already involved in the hiring process and has a reason for making sure the roles are filled.
- spacemadness 2y agoI wish it was this simple but you need to fix a lot of things about interviewing culturally before you take a sledgehammer to it all by instituting week by week quotas. “Well they might suck but we need to hire them as the week is almost out!” Seems like a recipe for disaster.