8 ms·
I would expect that in their data which they train AlphaProof on they have some concept of a "vague problem" whoch could just look like {Formal description of
by golol 2y ago
I would expect that in their data which they train AlphaProof on they have some concept of a "vague problem" whoch could just look like
{Formal description of the set in question} = ?
And then Alphaproof has to find candidate descriptions of this set and prove a theorem that they are equal to the above.
I doubt they would claim to solve the problem if they provided half of the answer.
- puttycat 2y ago> I doubt they would claim to solve the problem if they provided half of the answer. Stranger things have happened
- sebzim4500 2y agoTo be fair, that isn't half the answer it's like 99% of the answer. They clarified above that it provided the full answer though.
- JyB 2y agoThe deepmind team has a history of being misleading. The great StarCraft 2 strategist bot is still in mind.
- totoglazer 2y agoWhat’s the story with that bot? Always thought it was cool. Was that all smoke and mirrors?
- topato 2y agoI think maybe parent comment is referring to it essentially just employing a zerg rush but with the speed and reaction time of an AI? Not 100% sure... Unrelated, iirc the starcraft functionality was an early example of generalizing a pretrained NN, alphaGO, and showing that it could adapt to learn and defeat games across strategic domains, especially after it learned so much strategy from the most difficult, widely played, and most strategically-varied physical game available.
- chx 2y ago> I doubt they would claim to solve the problem if they provided half of the answer. This falls under extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof and we have seen nothing of the sort.